You are viewing the community [info]austincommunity

Previous Entry | Next Entry

What's this all about??

It’s official, The EDGE Magazine has been banned from attending any and all functions associated with the SXSW conference.

For the last seven years The EDGE Magazine has supported unsigned groups from San Antonio, San Marcos, Austin and surrounding cities. Every year the EDGE has donated over four to six pages of it’s March issue’s to covering the events and performances of the SXSW conference and asked nothing in return, not even for passes or wristbands. These were donated pages to help support the event and the groups that were performing.

For the last three years The EDGE has sponsored The Quadruple Heart Bypass Rockfest that goes on during the same time as SXSW. Since this show usually had Texas local and Indie band who didn’t have the honor of getting picked for a showcase from SXSW, the EDGE was honored to help support these groups when they need it most. Since the groups were not chosen to play any showcases we figured that it would in no way conflict with any of the other events going on during SXSW. And since we’ve been doing this for the last couple of years and had never had any problems with the SXSW committee that there would be no problem especially seeing that SXSW is supposed to be about supporting unsigned music and all. And let’s not forget to mention that our SXSW press credentials were not pulled the last 2 years we sponsored the QH Bypass, nor were we ever notified about SXSW concerns about what we endorse.

With out any phone calls or warnings to our office, Publicity director for SXSW Elizabeth Derzco, systematically contacted staff writers for The EDGE and revoked all their press credentials that had already been granted days prior, and forbid them from attending any SXSW conferences and all its events. We have even been forwarded emails from SXSW members threatening bands who are playing the “QH Bypass” that they would black ball their bands from the SXSW events, and they would never be able to play the event again. We were even informed that someone from the SXSW committee went so far as to contact music industry people that we have relationships with and tell them that we were banned from the event.

Our writers contacted our main office and forwarded us the emails from Elizabeth and the other SXSW members. Other sponsors of the Bypass were also threatened and have forwarded us their emails. We even received phone calls from our friends at some of the Record Labels who laughed along with us about the whole thing. We immediately contacted Mrs. Derzco asking if it was true about The EDGE being banned from the event. With a one line return email she confirmed that The EDGE was banned from SXSW do to us sponsoring a conflicting event. Over the phone a SXSW member had the nerve to ask the names of people who we might have had “PAID” for their passes separately. I guess this was so they could revoke their paid passes to.

In all my many years of working in the music business I have never seen such a political noose from such a power hungry, money hungry, group of individuals. It is quite sad and pathetic for SXSW to deny any sort of media support for bands that they undeniably rejected from their event.

I want to apologize to any of the groups that were threatened for their participation in The Bypass Rockfest. I also want to apologize to all of our contributing writers who were looking forward to covering the SXSW event. I don’t know why The EDGE Sponsorship was singled out this year. There are numerous performances going on during SXSW that are much larger and draw a lot of people away from some of the SXSW shows.

I personally don’t care about attending any of the SXSW conference events, and I don’t need anyone’s permission on what The EDGE can cover or can’t cover, and I certainly don’t need their permission to attend any of the shows that we have been personally invited to by labels. What I do care about is the way that this was handled. I think the reason we weren’t told about the banning sooner was because they probably knew I would print the whole thing out for people to read. I’m not writing this for people to rise against the establishment as I think it is just counterproductive to do so. I just want the supporters of The EDGE to understand that there is a much larger political structure that has nothing to do with supporting music that we face day in and day out. It all comes down to power and money. I regret not being able to let our writers cover the SXSW event. But in my opinion the true event is the “Bypass Rockfest” now. Where unsigned and Indie groups from Texas can come together and support one another. Isn’t that what SXSW was supposed to be about in the first place.

Don’t be surprised if the SXSW committee pulls extra strings closer to the event to make sure that the Fire Marshals, TABC, and any other entity that they have pull over to show up and cause extra headaches.

From this experience I want to let people know that from this date forward The EDGE will no longer support or sponsor anything from the SXSW conference itself.

We will continue to support our national and independent record label interests and there shows and performances during SXSW, and we will always continue to support unsigned South Texas Rock Artists.


The EDGE was created to open the doors for unsigned rock groups in South Texas and to let them have a voice. This just means that the EDGE will have to work harder to keep the music scene strong and thriving. We ask for your support in all of our events and efforts.

Support Your Scene….!!!


Thank you
Steve Freeman
Publisher of The EDGE Magazine
“Your True Texas Rock Connection”

Comments

( 28 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]thedarksyde wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:02 pm (UTC)
SXSW hasn't been about music for a long time.

Fuck them.
[info]veromarie wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:37 pm (UTC)
thats so fucking sad.
[info]purple_roses wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:03 pm (UTC)
I haven't liked SXSW since they started bringing in signed acts and charging huge admissions. I'm really sorry this happened to y'all. See you at Bypass!
[info]kimmlett wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:04 pm (UTC)
oops :)
Could you put this behind an LJ cut, please?
[info]cheebah wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:11 pm (UTC)
p.s... an lj-cut would be REALLY cool, thanks ;)
[info]veromarie wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:35 pm (UTC)
no prob, cool icon!
[info]cheebah wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:46 pm (UTC)
heh, thanks. I wish I could claim ownership, but alas it was stolen.
[info]grumpydragon wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:18 pm (UTC)
How to do an LJ-Cut

(lj-cut text="this is what the lj-cut text looks like") TEXT TO BE BEHIND CUT (/lj-cut)

Replace the ( ) with < >
[info]veromarie wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:35 pm (UTC)
calm down its done mr grumpy.
[info]grumpydragon wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 02:13 pm (UTC)
Thank you :)
[info]veromarie wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 02:35 pm (UTC)
:P
[info]bigbigtruck wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:39 pm (UTC)
Speaking of SXSW, when is Fuck By Fuck You? Is that still going on?
[info]bigbigtruck wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:40 pm (UTC)
hasty addendum -
(Not a snarky insult - I seem to recall someone mentioning a festival by that name running against SXSW.)
[info]a_czar wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:42 pm (UTC)
FXFY
Fuck by Fuck You is Saturday at Gallery Lombardi.
Way too many bands to list.
[info]bigbigtruck wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:41 pm (UTC)
Has this been forwarded to the Chronicle?
[info]cheebah wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:43 pm (UTC)
The Chronicle for this week is already out. Good timing on SXSW's part, eh?
[info]cube1of6 wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 07:51 pm (UTC)
not that it would do much good. the guy who runs the chronicle is the same guy that runs sxsw. they're extremely closely tied.
[info]cninety9 wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:45 pm (UTC)
I smell a publicity stunt.
[info]cheebah wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 01:51 pm (UTC)
Hmm... could be.
[info]mrmanatee wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 03:36 pm (UTC)
That would have to be the dumbest publicity stunt in history. Unless you mean on the part of Bypass, in which case it would be really beneficial for them in the short run but still be a terrible idea.
[info]cninety9 wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 03:40 pm (UTC)
It sounds like The Edge (which I've never heard of before) is drumming up a controversy with SXSW in order to get extra press for their show. I'm looking at a compiled list of non sxsw shows right now, and I don't even see their event listed. It's a smart way to market a competing event, but definitely a shady way to do it.
[info]mrmanatee wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 03:43 pm (UTC)
It's pretty clever, but they'll definitely get shit for it later if the truth comes out. Then again, if it didn't happen, SXSW probably won't even know about it or at least won't bother giving a response.

I like the whole 'LiveJournal as grassroots support' idea though.
[info]rebecca_yorke wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 03:28 pm (UTC)
WELL, considering that the chronicle is almost solely behind SXSW it is not suprising that they would NOT cover a story like this and that their issue is out early (as it is every year)

Secondly, could I strongly second the FUCK SXSW tone! I say B-S that wristbands are now $140 and sold out in 2 days, I say B-S that BILLY IDOL is playing while unsigned bands get the shoulder...give me a fucking BREAK!, and I say BS that they are playing bully to unsigned bands and indie record labels/magazines. FUCK SXSW (and that goes for film too! seeing as how they rejected an awesome film from my friends and are opting to play The Ring Two instead...TOTAL BS)...never again will you get my dough!
[info]veromarie wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 03:34 pm (UTC)
The Ring Two?! Are you serious?

thats fucked.
[info]mrmanatee wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 03:37 pm (UTC)
Well, it's pretty damn hard to justify not showing The Ring 2.
[info]veromarie wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 03:44 pm (UTC)
heh, seriously
[info]zillioneyes wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 03:29 pm (UTC)
You're an idiot if you think SXSW is nothing more than a fucking corporate stunt these days.

Trust me, I work for a major record label and I see the ugly side of it. I hate the whole fesitval altogether.
[info]sdx wrote:
Mar. 10th, 2005 06:25 pm (UTC)
Thats totally fucked.
Strong arm tactics are not what Austin is supposed to be about.

And they have horrible booking for some of their bands. I'm not trying to be biased, they have some great selections, but some of the bands they're showcasing sound like complete and utter ass, and yet some of our awesome local talents (like AE) remain passed over by this shitty festival.

This is what money does to people.
It takes something that was started with a beautiful mission, and a purpose, and it corrupts it, and turns it ugly.
( 28 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2012
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow